Okay, so I reread this a couple days ago and had to take it down a couple stars. What really kills me is the fact that the characters are all flatter than my online chemistry textbook. They're all either "good" or "bad," when the reality is that no one can be just good or bad— maybe too much Speaker of the Dead influence?
Yay, proof that Dink isn't a wimp!
A lot of parallels between this and his other books... and things I don't understand... but it was wonderful anyways.
I don't know if there are words to describe it...
I remember reading this in elementary school, and before I read the book, for some reason I thought Ruby Holler was a name XD
There was a lot of hype about this book when it first came out, and now that I've finally read it, I think it was probably just the age of the author when it was written. Maybe it's just because I'm older than the intended audience, but you can tell it was written by a twelve-year-old. Name dropping (i.e. Brönte, Verne) to sound smart is really immature, and including random names like Cody when everyone else is named Milton, Aska, Slime-beak... Also, the world-building felt very incomplete. Some birds had last names, some didn't, how birds tap their heads with their claws is beyond me. Maybe Redwall, Warriors, and the Guardians of Ga'Hoole series just conditioned me to expect more from this type of story... meh...
It didn't get really exciting until the inevitable gotta-team-up-with-the-good-guys part, and even that was... not what I expected.
FINALLY FINISHED.
I mean... it was pretty meh... or maybe I'm just getting over the whole Secret-Service-terrorist-plot thing.
Amazing. You know that feeling you get sometimes when you read a book, and by the time you get to the end, you feel like it was way too short? This book was... really long. But it was awesome, so, it was an excess of awesomeness.
1
Not much needs to be said since it's John Flanagan, but the series is pretty good so far. I liked The Ranger's Apprentice series better, but oh well. :P